Threat Models & Foundational Reports
7 entriesHow Shor's and Grover's algorithms threaten blockchain signatures and hashing, and how urgent it is.
Academic Research on Post-Quantum Blockchains
3 entriesProposals for lattice-based and hash-based replacements.
Standards & Algorithm Sources
8 entriesThe NIST algorithms blockchains are likely to adopt.
Blockchain Protocol & Industry Perspectives
10 entriesHow protocols and communities are planning for quantum-safe migration.
Related Pages
6 entriesRelated blockchain directories on this site.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does quantum computing threaten blockchains?
Shor's algorithm could derive private keys from public keys for ECDSA, endangering funds at exposed addresses, while Grover's algorithm only gives a quadratic speed-up against hashing and so mostly affects mining and hash lengths.
Is Bitcoin at risk today?
No quantum computer today can break ECDSA, but coins whose public keys are exposed are the first to be at risk, and migration of a decentralised network takes years, so planning has started.
Which signatures could replace ECDSA?
NIST-standardised ML-DSA (lattice-based), SLH-DSA (hash-based) and Falcon are leading candidates, each with larger keys or signatures than ECDSA.
Are there quantum-resistant blockchains already?
QRL was designed around hash-based signatures from the start, and other networks such as Algorand use Falcon in parts of their protocol.
Where can I read more on blockchains?
See the Blockchain Platforms, Tools and Resources pages, and the Post-Quantum Cryptography page on this site.