1. Concepts and Foundations
7 entriesThe origins of the superintelligence and intelligence-explosion ideas. Foundational texts, old and recent.
2. Alignment and Control Research
12 entriesTechnical work on keeping advanced systems aligned with human intent. Active research areas, not solved problems.
3. Research Organisations
7 entriesGroups working on safety, evaluation and policy. Mission statements, not endorsements.
4. Risk Analyses and Arguments
6 entriesStructured arguments about catastrophic and extreme risks. Including sceptical and cautious positions.
5. Governance and Policy
9 entriesProposals and commitments for governing frontier and superhuman systems. Law and policy move quickly; check for updates.
6. Visions and Forecasts
5 entriesEssays describing possible futures with very capable AI. Perspectives, not predictions to rely on.
7. Related Pages on This Site
6 entriesDirectories on capabilities, governance and security. Where the building blocks and safeguards are listed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is superintelligence?
Superintelligence, or artificial superintelligence (ASI), refers to an intellect that greatly exceeds human performance across most domains of interest. Nick Bostrom popularised the term. It is a hypothetical future capability, not an existing system.
What is an intelligence explosion?
The idea, from I. J. Good, is that a system able to improve its own design could start a feedback loop of rapid capability gains. Whether this is likely, and how fast it would be, is debated. Chalmers and MIRI analyse the argument.
What is AI alignment?
Alignment research aims to make AI systems pursue the goals their designers and users intend. Active topics include reward modelling, scalable oversight, debate, constitutional methods, weak-to-strong generalization and interpretability.
What is scalable oversight?
Scalable oversight asks how humans can reliably supervise AI systems on tasks too hard for people to evaluate directly. Proposals include debate, recursive reward modelling and using weaker models to supervise stronger ones.
Is superintelligence an existential risk?
Researchers disagree. Some, including signatories of the Statement on AI Risk, argue that advanced AI could pose extinction-level risks. Others consider the risk speculative or exaggerated. Structured arguments and surveys help compare positions.
How might superintelligence be governed?
Proposals include international oversight bodies, compute governance, licensing and evaluation of frontier models, and binding safety commitments. Existing instruments include the EU AI Act, the NIST AI RMF and voluntary commitments from the Bletchley and Seoul summits.
How current is this list?
Links were checked in November 2026. Some sites block automated checks and may need a manual click. This page is a resource list, not advice or a forecast, and essays reflect their authors' views.