Reasoning LLMs logopeterindia.net
Knowledge Hub

Reasoning LLMs: Chain-of-Thought, RL Training & Test-Time Compute

How language models learn to think before they answer — chain-of-thought, reinforcement learning, test-time compute, open models and training stacks, benchmarks and limits.

90 topics•9 categories•Updated October 2026

What Are Reasoning LLMs?

6 entries

Reasoning LLMs generate a long, explicit chain of intermediate steps before giving a final answer, and spend more computation at inference time on harder problems. The modern recipe combines chain-of-thought prompting and its descendants, training signals from verifiers or process reward models, reinforcement learning on tasks with checkable answers such as maths and code, and test-time compute scaling through longer reasoning, sampling or search. They excel at maths, coding and multi-step planning, but cost more, can overthink simple questions, and do not always report their real reasoning. The readable guides below are the fastest way in.

Foundations: Prompting for Reasoning

8 entries

The ideas that preceded and underpin reasoning models.

Training Reasoning: Verifiers, Rewards & Reinforcement Learning

15 entries

How models learn to reason rather than merely imitate.

15STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningLearn from self-generated rationales that reach correct answers. 16Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems (GSM8K)Outcome verifiers and the GSM8K dataset. 17Let's Verify Step by StepProcess supervision beats outcome supervision for maths. 18Math-ShepherdProcess reward models without human step labels. 19The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical ReasoningPractical lessons and pitfalls with PRMs. 20DeepSeekMathIntroduced GRPO, a critic-free RL algorithm widely reused. 21DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement LearningOpen-weight model trained with large-scale RL on verifiable rewards. 22Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMsRL recipe with long-context scaling. 23Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-TrainingOpen post-training recipe including RL with verifiable rewards. 24DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleOpen RL system with training-stability techniques. 25Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMsWhat makes long reasoning emerge and how to shape it. 26LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language ModelsSurvey of post-training methods for reasoning. 27Quiet-STaRModels learn to think before speaking at every token. 28Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent SpaceReasoning in hidden states instead of words (Coconut). 29Let's Think Dot by DotHidden computation in filler tokens.

Test-Time Compute & Efficient Reasoning

8 entries

Spending inference compute where it helps.

Reasoning Models & Provider Documentation

14 entries

Official guides for the main model families.

Open Training Stacks, Libraries & Datasets

13 entries

Reproduce and fine-tune reasoning models.

Benchmarks & Evaluation

12 entries

Measuring reasoning, and its limits.

Limits, Faithfulness & Safety

5 entries

Where reasoning models fall short.

Related Pages

9 entries

Neighbouring pages on this site.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a reasoning LLM?

A reasoning LLM generates an explicit chain of intermediate steps, often long, before its final answer, and is typically trained with reinforcement learning on tasks whose answers can be checked, such as maths and code. It spends more compute at inference time on harder problems.

How are reasoning models trained?

Common ingredients are supervised fine-tuning on reasoning traces, reward signals from outcome verifiers or process reward models, and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards using algorithms such as GRPO. DeepSeek-R1, Kimi k1.5, Tulu 3 and Qwen3 describe open recipes.

What is test-time compute scaling?

It means improving answers by using more computation at inference, for example longer chains of thought, sampling many answers and voting, or search guided by a verifier. Research such as Snell et al. and s1 shows it can rival scaling model size on some tasks.

What are the main limitations?

Reasoning models cost more tokens and time, can overthink simple questions, may produce chains of thought that do not reflect their actual computation, and still fail on some complex problems. Benchmark scores also date quickly, so test on your own tasks.

How current is this page?

Links were checked in October 2026. Reasoning models change quickly: model names, prices and benchmark scores date fast, and many papers are arXiv preprints. For a side-by-side model comparison see our Large Reasoning Models page. Sites that block automated checks are kept and may need a manual click.