What Are Reasoning LLMs?
6 entriesReasoning LLMs generate a long, explicit chain of intermediate steps before giving a final answer, and spend more computation at inference time on harder problems. The modern recipe combines chain-of-thought prompting and its descendants, training signals from verifiers or process reward models, reinforcement learning on tasks with checkable answers such as maths and code, and test-time compute scaling through longer reasoning, sampling or search. They excel at maths, coding and multi-step planning, but cost more, can overthink simple questions, and do not always report their real reasoning. The readable guides below are the fastest way in.
Foundations: Prompting for Reasoning
8 entriesThe ideas that preceded and underpin reasoning models.
Training Reasoning: Verifiers, Rewards & Reinforcement Learning
15 entriesHow models learn to reason rather than merely imitate.
Test-Time Compute & Efficient Reasoning
8 entriesSpending inference compute where it helps.
Reasoning Models & Provider Documentation
14 entriesOfficial guides for the main model families.
Open Training Stacks, Libraries & Datasets
13 entriesReproduce and fine-tune reasoning models.
Benchmarks & Evaluation
12 entriesMeasuring reasoning, and its limits.
Limits, Faithfulness & Safety
5 entriesWhere reasoning models fall short.
Related Pages
9 entriesNeighbouring pages on this site.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a reasoning LLM?
A reasoning LLM generates an explicit chain of intermediate steps, often long, before its final answer, and is typically trained with reinforcement learning on tasks whose answers can be checked, such as maths and code. It spends more compute at inference time on harder problems.
How are reasoning models trained?
Common ingredients are supervised fine-tuning on reasoning traces, reward signals from outcome verifiers or process reward models, and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards using algorithms such as GRPO. DeepSeek-R1, Kimi k1.5, Tulu 3 and Qwen3 describe open recipes.
What is test-time compute scaling?
It means improving answers by using more computation at inference, for example longer chains of thought, sampling many answers and voting, or search guided by a verifier. Research such as Snell et al. and s1 shows it can rival scaling model size on some tasks.
What are the main limitations?
Reasoning models cost more tokens and time, can overthink simple questions, may produce chains of thought that do not reflect their actual computation, and still fail on some complex problems. Benchmark scores also date quickly, so test on your own tasks.
How current is this page?
Links were checked in October 2026. Reasoning models change quickly: model names, prices and benchmark scores date fast, and many papers are arXiv preprints. For a side-by-side model comparison see our Large Reasoning Models page. Sites that block automated checks are kept and may need a manual click.