Three design families: small encoders that score options directly, LLMs read through their logits, and LLMs with dedicated decision heads.
01Encoder + decision head
by NandhaKishorM (Convai Innovations)
A non-autoregressive decision engine that scores the question and its options together in one forward pass. Supports choice, score and yes/no questions across 100+ languages, with calibrated probabilities and optional abstention.
- Base
- ModernBERT-large (English), mmBERT-base (multilingual)
- Size
- 322M–421M parameters
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
Best forFast multilingual decisions on small models.
Ships an HTTP server compatible with Jev's, plus LangChain and MCP integrations. Its package page reports about 7.8× lower latency than Jev on its own benchmarks and notes Jev does better on label sets of 50+ options.
Repository → PyPI →
02LLM logit readout
by Bespoke Labs
Adds Jev-style behaviour to an existing open LLM: it reads the model's scores for the permitted answer tokens and turns them into probabilities, instead of generating text.
- Base
- Qwen3.5-9B with rank-16 LoRA
- Size
- 9B parameters
- Licence
- No license listed on GitHub
Best forTraining, research and studying the data-curation recipe.
Publishes the model, training recipe, evaluation setup and data-curation pipeline.
Repository →
03LLM + decision heads
by Jared Palmer
A family of small decision models you can train and run yourself. Handles yes/no, multiple-choice and rating questions in one request, and its server is designed so the TypeSafe Python SDK works against it unchanged.
- Base
- Qwen3.5 (0.8B, 4B, 9B) and Qwen3.8-27B
- Size
- 0.8B to 27B parameters
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
Best forJev-compatible local deployment and fine-tuning on your own data.
Runs on CUDA, ROCm or Apple Silicon (MLX); the largest model handles up to 65,536 tokens of state.
Repository →
04LLM logit readout
by Theo Lee (independent)
A research experiment that needs no fine-tuning: it reads the logits for the allowed answers straight from an open model. The demo compares that direct readout with asking the model to write probabilities as JSON.
- Base
- Qwen3 0.6B, MiniCPM5 2B or Qwen3.5 4B
- Size
- Model-dependent
- Licence
- MIT
Best forExperiments and trying System One ideas on models you already have.
Formerly called OpenJev; independent and not affiliated with TypeSafe. The demo runs fully in your browser via wllama.
Repository → Live demo (openjev.com) →
05LLM logit readout
by Rizzo AI Academy
The open, local take on Jev: it limits each decision to a set of answer tokens, reads their logits and converts them to probabilities, without generating any text.
- Base
- Open Spark-X2.5 models served with llama.cpp
- Size
- About 1.7B–4B parameters
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
Best forLocal deployment on varied hardware, with a Jev-like HTTP interface.
Change the base URL to point existing Jev clients at a local server.
Repository →
06Encoder + decision head
by wfzyx
A compact, non-autoregressive System One model that uses option markers to produce scores for choice, yes/no and score decisions directly.
- Base
- ModernBERT (about 395M parameters)
- Size
- ~395M parameters
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
Best forSmall, fast inference on CPU or modest GPUs.
Targets sub-15 ms decisions; runs on CUDA, ROCm, Apple Silicon and CPU.
Repository →
07LLM + decision heads
by Tianyu (TianyuCodings)
A small, trainable Jev-style replica with parallel decisions, dynamic candidates and an end-to-end training pipeline.
- Base
- Qwen3-0.6B
- Size
- 0.6B parameters
- Licence
- MIT
Best forLearning how Jev-style architectures are built and trained.
Designed as a nano-scale replica for experimentation.
Repository →
08LLM + decision heads
by Strands Labs
A small, fast decision model for agentic workflows. It picks between options or rates something on a scale, returning a calibrated confidence with every decision, and ships a command-line tool and an inference server.
- Base
- Qwen3.5-2B-Base with the language head replaced by a pointer head, plus a rank-16 LoRA adapter
- Size
- About 1.9B parameters
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
Best forDecisions inside agents built with the Strands Agents SDK.
The project reports that answers at a confidence of 0.9 or higher were right about 95% of the time on short classification tasks it had not seen; treat that as the authors' own evaluation.
Repository →